Obama Seeking New Mideast Approach

President Obama is challenging his administration to formulate a new Middle East policy that emphasizes political and economic reforms to bolster US allies now threatened by the protest movements sweeping the region.

Administration officials say Obama is urging beleaguered governments to enact reforms that would satisfy the popular craving for change while preserving valuable partnerships on crucial US interests, from oil security to counter-terrorism and containing Iran.

With those allied governments under pressure from their citizens, the US is confronting the likelihood of having diminished influence over whatever political order emerges. But a greater risk is that Washington could be seen as trying to prop up crumbling regimes and could alienate the rising pro-democracy leaders.

Diplomats say it would be difficult for the president to openly call for sweeping political change in such key countries as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Jordan, which are run by royal families allied with the West. Direct criticism of longstanding, friendly monarchs could be seen as an abandonment and encourage even more protests.

Administration officials who spoke on background because they were not authorized to discuss policy-making said the president and other key White House figures have pushed reforms in private calls, making the case that such changes are for the leaders’ own good.

They have told the Saudis they should support efforts by the Sunni royal family in neighboring Bahrain to work out a new power-sharing arrangement with Shiite Muslims, who make up the majority of the country’s population and who have been leading the street protests in the tiny kingdom.

Mindful that Bahrain hosts the US Navy’s 5th Fleet, which, among other tasks, protects oil shipments through the Persian Gulf, the US has pressed Saudi Arabia to encourage Bahrain to make a deal, and has asked it to chip in money to help make sure the reforms satisfy the Shiites, a senior administration official said.

“We have the same objective — we want stability in Bahrain,” the official said.

The official said the administration’s scramble to persuade leaders to implement reforms was partly defensive. “If the leaders who’ve promised things don’t deliver, you’ve got the possibility of further unrest and deeper violence” that would further imperil US interests, he said.

The White House also has told diplomats to expand their outreach to the allies’ opposition leaders, rising political figures and others who operate outside official government circles. Though some outreach already exists, the administration failed to anticipate the scale of the unrest.

Aides said Obama recognized the need to shift gears soon after the Egyptian street protests began Jan. 25. He warned national security aides that they should anticipate further upheaval “not just in countries where there are protests, but in countries where there have not yet been protests,” said a senior administration official who was at the meeting in the White House Situation Room.

Obama spoke for about 10 minutes, telling staff members they were facing a fundamental change in the region and that the US needed a new policy.

“The president concluded by telling us…we wouldn’t be simply responding to protests in individual countries, but revisiting our entire approach to take into account the changes that are taking place,” the aide said. Obama directed them to elevate democracy and the expansion of political and economic rights “as core interests of ours in the region.”

The new strategy was also a reaction to disappointing results from the administration’s original policy. Obama came to office determined to avoid the appearance of interfering in other nations’ affairs. The goal was to distinguish his administration from that of predecessor George W. Bush, who had lectured Arab states and others on the need to democratize.

But Obama has lived through nearly two years of foreign policy setbacks. When Iran cracked down on street protests that erupted after its 2009 elections, he was criticized for not doing enough to support the demonstrators and losing an opportunity to pressure Iran’s theocracy.

The president has made muted statements about China’s violations of human rights, giving higher priority to disputes with Beijing over currency and trade.

Yet the paltry results of that approach and the ascendance of a team of pro-democracy advisors at the National Security Council appear to be having a pronounced influence on the president’s actions and rhetoric. Younger aides including Samantha Power, Ben Rhodes and Michael McFaul, a Stanford University professor on leave, have been strong internal voices for pro-democratic movements in the Middle East.

As evidence of the evolving approach, administration aides cite Obama’s September speech to the United Nations General Assembly, in which he stated that his allegiance was not to particular rulers but to whole populations. “The idea is a simple one — that freedom, justice and peace for the world must begin with freedom, justice and peace in the lives of individual human beings,” he told the U.N.

Complete article via Los Angeles Times

Advertisements

2 Comments to “Obama Seeking New Mideast Approach”

  1. There’s one missing perspective on the current revolutions. How would Iraq have been today, amidst this whole arab unrest, if there had been no war? Read it here.
    http://haphazardcontemplations.wordpress.com/2011/02/26/the-missing-analysis/

  2. That is an excellent – and very thought-provoking point.

    I’d counter, though, with the suggestion that an Iraq under Saddam Hussein would be much more like an Iran on steroids in its response to dissent in the sense that Hussein always had a fairly disciplined regime security apparatus in place.

    In the article you’ve cited is the line, “The democracy in Iraq is in tatters while democracy in Egypt and Tunisia has made a promising start.” Very true, but that’s all it is…with the emphasis on “promise.”

    There’s a post elsewhere on this site, Leaders Are Gone, But Regimes Are Not, that provides a caution – a cation that was, I think, reinforced by yesterday’s military response to the demonstration in Tahrir.

    Will know in time, of course, but, especially because I had not considered it previously, your core point is an excellent one to consider.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: